December 21st, 2009
There are a lot of good arguments not to have a state constitutional convention.
* It will be costly, as much as $12 million to $20 million. The 1997 convention rejected by voters was projected to cost $50 million.
* The delegation could easily end up being stacked with puppets for powerful legislators and special interest groups, no matter how many safeguards they put in.
* Membership will be heavily skewed to New York City and Long Island, where the bulk of the state’s population lives.
* The Legislature already has the power to make many of the improvements that supporters of a convention are hollering about, including ethics reform, mandate relief, and tax and spending caps.
* You could be worse off than you are now, if the convention produces amendments that result in changes that increase the cost of government.
* And realistically, it’s possible it won’t accomplish much, if anything. The last constitutional convention, held in 1967, was considered a bust. Every single one of the recommendations made during the five-month convention was eventually rejected by voters, even though some of the amendments would have improved life for many New Yorkers. So when the proposal for holding a convention came up for a vote in 1977 and again in 1997, citizens decided they didn’t want to bother.
There you have it. Six solid reasons why the state shouldn’t hold a constitutional convention.
They should hold one anyway. Here’s why.
Read the rest of this entry »